Microtubule Mechanics: A Little Flexibility Goes a Long Way

1. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 and 17–52. 2. Hain, T.J.A., and Neff, B.D. (2006). Promiscuity drives self-referent kin recognition. Curr. Biol. 16, 1807–1811. 3. Sherman, P.W., Reeve, H.K., and Pfennig, D.W. (1997). Recognition systems. In Behavioural Ecology, Fourth edition, J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds. (Malden, MA: Blackwell Science), pp. 69–98. 4. Lorenz, K. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. J. Ornithol. 83, 137–213, 289–413. 5. tenCate, C., Verzijden,M.N., and Etman, E. (2006). Sexual imprinting can induce sexual preferences for exaggerated parental traits. Curr. Biol. 16, 1128–1132. 6. Sharp, S.P., McGowan, A., Wood, M.J., and Hatchwell, B.J. (2005). Learned kin recognition cues in a social bird. Nature 434, 1127–1130. 7. Quinn, J.S., Woolfenden, G.E., Fitzpatrick, J.W., and White, B.N. (1999). Multi-locus DNA fingerprinting supports genetic monogamy in Florida scrub-jays. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45, 1–10. 8. Hauber, M.E., and Sherman, P.W. (2001). Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci. 24, 609–616. 9. Kilner, R.M., Madden, J.R., and Hauber, M.E. (2004). Brood parasitic cowbird nestlings use host young to procure resources. Science 305, 877–879. 10. Holmes, W.G., and Sherman, P.W. (1982). The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Amer. Zool. 22, 491–517. 11. Göth, A., and Hauber, M.E. (2004). Ecological approaches to species recognition in birds through studies of model and non-model species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 41, 823–842. 12. Hauber, M.E., Sherman, P.W., and Paprika, D. (2000). Self-referent phenotype matching in a brood parasite: the armpit effect in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Anim. Cognit. 3, 113–117. 13. Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype (San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman). 14. Gruntman,M., and Novoplansky, A. (2004). Physiologically mediated self/non-self discrimination in roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3863–3867. 15. Jacob, S., McClintock, M.K., Zelano, B., and Ober, C. (2002). Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women’s choice of male odor. Nat. Genet. 30, 175–179. 16. Neff, B.D., and Sherman, P.W. (2005). In vitro fertilization reveals offspring recognition via self-referencing in a fish with paternal care and cuckoldry. Ethol. 111, 425–438. 17. Gross, M.R. (1982). Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes Z. Tierpsychol. 60, 1–26. 18. Neff, B.D. (2003). Decisions about parental care in response to perceived paternity. Nature 422, 716–719. 19. Mateo, J.M. (2002). Kin recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 269, 721–727. 20. Mays, H.L., Jr., and Hill, G.E. (2004). Choosing mats: genes that are good versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 19, 554–559.